Gang stalking is mentioned in several scientific articles, which were published in scientific journals.
In 2008 gang stalking was discussed during a congress for criminologists in Barcelona.
This was written by the Belgian criminologist Jean-Nicolas Desurmont. This definition fits criminologists. It requires that you prove the harassment.
There’s a linguistic problem.
The scientific definitions of gang stalking and mobbing are inconsistent, vague and confusing. They don’t make a clear distinction between gang stalking and mobbing. They don’t say clearly whether mobbing can happen everywhere or only at the workplace.
Different sciences treat gang stalking, mobbing and bullying in a different way.
There are more than 150 scientific definitions of organized crime. They all have their own point of view. For example, you can concentrate on who is doing it, how it’s being done or what the function is. This suggests that all the different definitions of gang stalking may be equally right. Generally, a definition which lists a series of characteristics will receive most criticism.
I propose the following definition.
This definition fits psychologists. It doesn’t require that you prove the harassment.
Victims of gang stalking are self-labelled, just like victims of mobbing and bullying. It’s not required that you can prove the harassment. Scientific research doesn’t ask you to give the impossible proof.
You are permanently
Every electronic device which you use will be hacked (computer, internet, telephone, alarm, camera).
They come in your house during every absence.
Every encounter with a mind control gang stalker (perp, robot-person, biorobot or zombie) will be seen as an excellent opportunity to carry out a psychological attack against you.
And there’s no way to escape this.
The first mobbing researcher and author of “Suicide factory” wrote: “It also shows that this social situation is not linear, that is, people hardly ever suffer from degrees of mobbing — either one is a victim or one is not.” This means that if you’re a victim, then you probably experience all types of harassment, even if you didn’t notice, even if it seems to be ‘only’ harassment at work or in school.
80% of all people who commit suicide do this because of gang stalking.
Almost all victims lose their job and never find a new job.
1 in 7 victims has become incontinent due to the harassment.
Gang stalking is one of the most common practices. For a large part of the population stalking is their normal lifestyle. You need a large part of the population if you want to stalk so many people. 1 in 70 people experience gang stalking. 1 in 30 workers experience mobbing at work. 7 in 10 middle school and high school students experience bullying in school.
Gang stalking is as if everyone is singing: “You are shit. We don’t want you here.”
Correction’s Officer Mary Jackson reported gang stalking to the FBI. She wrote: “An FBI agent told me when I reported it (and I quote) ‘Well stuff like this happens all the time. I suggest you just get on with your life and forget about it.’”
How do you explain that victims are harassed in just the same way in every country they go, even in countries that are each other’s enemy?
How do you explain that all gang stalkers keep their mouth shut?
How do you explain that no target in the world succeeded in locking the gang stalkers out of his house?
How do you explain that no target in the world succeeded in filming the gang stalkers during illegal entry in his house?
Gang stalking is in the first place a matter of corruption. It couldn’t exist if the police, the politicians, the doctors and the media were doing their job. Even human rights organizations have become so corrupt that they completely ignore this problem.
Gang stalking is in the second place a matter of law. We don’t have suitable laws for punishing a large group of civilians. Such laws do exist for certain categories of people like soldiers and prisoners: all participants are sentenced to death or all participants are convicted for every crime that has been committed by the group. These laws have to be extended to include gangstalkers. Every gangstalker has to be convicted for every crime that his network has committed against the target. Failure to report or suppress gang stalking has to be treated as a crime.
Gang stalking is in the third place a matter of innovation. We are in the transition from impact weapons to energetic weapons. Our justice system is completely unprepared for this.
Gang stalking is in the fourth place a matter of evolution. Evolution theory can be applied to crime. If you vote new laws to fight crime, then a common type of criminal will disappear, but a new type of more cunning criminal will take his place. This type of criminal is immune for the law just like some bacteria have become immune for antibiotics: the resistant bacteria. Gangstalkers are resistant criminals.
Organized stalking is a bad expression. Every stalker has to get organized to carry out his acts of stalking. So the word organized doesn’t add anything to stalking because every type of stalking is organized.
Organizational stalking is a good expression because it means that there’s an organization behind this type of stalking.
Gang stalking is less effective if you are fully aware of the harassment. The first objective should be to inform every target.
Gang stalking and electronic harassment are crimes that cannot be prevented. They will always have to be remedied afterwards in court. At this moment this isn’t possible, because the victim has to file a complaint against every individual stalker, who will get his individual trial. This costs the victim all his money.
Justice and medicine are still in the era of impact weapons while victims are already in the era of energetic weapons.
I propose these changes:
© 2017 Cliff Huylebroeck